Access to patient isolation rooms matters

Posted

9th October 2023

Research

Infection prevention and control is complex and incorporates a whole range of measures to keep patients, residents, staff and visitors safe when entering a healthcare facility.

These measures are inclusive of improved hand hygiene, surveillance, environmental cleaning, antimicrobial stewardship, personal protective equipment (PPE) and isolation of patients that may pose a higher risk.

Patient isolation relies on the ability of facilities to access single rooms for high-risk patients in the attempt to reduce the transmission of infectious agents or disease by limiting exposure to droplets and airborne particles and reducing contact with other people and the environment.

In many Australian facilities, this is dependent on the availability of single rooms, or isolation rooms, and many older facilities do not have an adequate number of single rooms available to allocate patients. One study highlighted that single room occupancy did not fall below 99.4% indicating demand remains high for single patient rooms[1].

The inability to access these rooms can impact patient flow from Emergency Departments, leading to congestion and “bed blocking” when rooms cannot be found for newly admitted patients. Secondly, studies have shown that increasing the proportion of single rooms can reduce the rate of Healthcare-Associated Infections (HAI)[2].

Temporary pop-up isolation rooms may provide a solution for healthcare facilities to help manage patient flow and infection prevention, by enabling them to rapidly flex isolation capacity to meet demand. Balancing clinical and patient priorities to manage droplet and contact precautions, they can help free up existing permanent isolation rooms for priority patients. A recent Australian study showed there is some evidence to suggest adoption of such a room can be a cost-effective solution if implemented[3].

For further information, we invite you to explore our campaign, IPC ‘Moments that Matter’, where you can find valuable resources. Find out more here >

References
Bloomer, MJ, Lee, SF, Lewis, DP, Biro, MA & Moss, C 2016, ‘Single-room usage patterns and allocation decision-making in an Australian public hospital: a sequential exploratory study’, Journal of Clinical Nursing, vol. 25, no. 15-16, pp. 2200–2210.

Stiller, A, Salm, F, Bischoff, P & Gastmeier, P 2016, ‘Relationship between hospital ward design and healthcare-associated infection rates: a systematic review and meta-analysis’, Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control, vol. 5, no. 1.

Graves, N, Kiernan, M & Mitchell, BG 2022, ‘A cost-effectiveness model for a decision to adopt temporary single-patient rooms to reduce risks of healthcare-associated infection in the Australian public healthcare system’, Infection, Disease & Health, vol. 27, no. 3.

SHARE THIS ARTICLE

Tags

Latest News

Research

Can patient and resident hand hygiene be part of the solution to preventing infections?

The importance of practising proper hand hygiene is widely considered…

Research

Confronting the hidden threat of C. diff

The power of effective surface decontamination The hidden threat of…

Company News

Reflections and learnings from International Infection Prevention Week (IIPW)

International Infection Prevention Week shines a spotlight on the crucial…

Research

Access to patient isolation rooms matters

Infection prevention and control is complex and incorporates a whole…